[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?

  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • To: Jonathan.Robie@S..., Jonathan.Robie@S...,Mike.Champion@S..., xml-dev@l...
  • Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 16:01:48 -0500

otw w3c
Title: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?
If you were describing a technology, I could accept that.  I had no problems
with XML Query languages because I had seen that tried.   HTML was
generic coding per GenCode and most of the tags in it were the ones Truly
Donovan did for Charles.   HTTP was the same thing an ISO 9000 tape
header did and ftp managed.  Nothing cutting edge about any of that.
 
But semantic web?  What the heck is that?  A web of meaning?  Well, nice.
When I need a philosophical spider, I'll get a service to send me meaningful
answers to philosophical questions.  The point is behavioral:  tell me what a
semantic web does.  For each of those, we can name a service and that
will lead to a set of requirements for that service.  OTW, it isn't one of
those nifty "dreams unrealized".  It is a sloppy requirement.  No one is
laughing it off.  We are debating bad specs, bad writing, closed processes,
etc.
 
If someone had at the beginning of XML said, "We will create a validation
substitute for DTDs" instead of "we only need well-formed XML", we might
have saved a lot of evil email that went around until the kimono was opened
and a plan was announced.   That is precisely what Simon and others
object to vehemently and accurately.  That is closure at its worst.  When
validation articles using the instance language were announced, Simon
and crew did a first rate job at providing a model for that.  Open worked.
 
Until Tim tells us what a semantic web does, it is a crock and no effort
should be expended on it.  We understand services and there is a lot
to learn before we can orchestrate them to the customer's satisfaction.

Len
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan.Robie@S... [mailto:Jonathan.Robie@S...]
Sent: Monday, October 16, 2000 2:51 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len); Jonathan.Robie@S...; Mike.Champion@S...; xml-dev@l...
Subject: RE: Realistic proposals to the W3C?

Bullard, Claude L wrote:

> The Semantic Web is a crock.  You can't explain and
> neither can Berners-Lee. 

Unlike Tim, I do not claim to know whether the semantic web can pan out or not. However, if the W3C is to be a research lab for the web, it has to be free to try some things that are not proven technology.

In 1997, most people I talked to about XML query languages thought the whole idea was a crock. Today, the idea seems to have caught fire. The XQL folks and the XML-QL folks were investigating this area before it was clear to most people that it would be worthwhile.

HTML and HTTP also had plenty of critics in their early days.

Of course, so did many technologies we now laugh off. Some ideas that seem ridiculous really are. But it takes time to sort these things out, and why try to stop other people from putting their efforts into things that I do not yet see the significance of?


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.