[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Must DTDs constrain order?
Evan Lenz wrote: > > In a DTD, is it possible to not constrain order on a given set of possible > elements, while still constraining quantity? > > For example > > <!ELEMENT foo (bar, bat?, bang*)> > > Can I somehow allow bar, bat, and bang to be in any order? I suspect not > but would love to be corrected. In an SGML DTD you would do this with the "&" operator. Unfortunately, XML has dropped the "&" in the interest of simplicity (that is, simplicity of parser implementation). Maybe now that we're all sophisticated enough to handle XML Schemas, we should bring back the "&" in DTDs. :-) But I digress. It might still be theoretically possible to model this in XML DTDs if you did something more sophisticated like: <!ELEMENT foo ( (bar, bat?, bang*) | (bat?, bar, bang*) | (bang*, bar, bat?) ... )> But I SERIOUSLY doubt this could be done unambiguously for all possible combinations, and as you can see would quickly become far to complex a solution for all but the simplest content models. Sorry. Michael A. Rossi Computer Sciences Corporation mailto:mrossi@c... 856-983-4400 x4911
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|