[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Who will maintain SAX?
Simon sez: >So how exactly do you explain the widespread support for SAX in pretty much >every parser, even those from the 'big boys'? I don't see them labeling >SAX as a private experimental API in their docs. >Some days I wonder if the bias toward institutions is just built into the >SGML way, or if maybe it's just my life as an independent consultant that >gives me a different perspective on the (low) value of such things. Because an event-based callback parser is a requirement. It could have come from anywhere, but getting it here saved a lot of hassle. Your perspective may be based on that. When something is first offered and easy to adopt, they adopt it. It's cheaper to let this list do that work and it is the right thing to do because it is experimental. But not when it comes time to extend it. That is when each decision has the most impact on the codebase and responsible vendors protect their customers. Otherwise, we are back to Sun Owns Java, Adobe Owns PDF and so on. You get a PAS (publicly accessible specification) instead of an openly developed specification. What I said, "At this juncture..." has to do with lifecycle requirements. What is required now, in my opinion, is a defined process, a credible institution, and the capacity of the institution to engage multiple issues and direct the work. It is committee work now. SAX is stable but if opened to political agendas, that future becomes uncertain. Faced with uncertainty, the "big guys" will seek a means to reduce that and when they control the consortia, that isn't hard to do. It's as easy as taking SGML and renaming it XML, then telling the world they invented it. See XML Magazine, Fall 2000, Vol 1, No 4: Who's Open Now? Sean Gallagher: "Considering that Sun essentially claims to have invented XML..." Let's pass on the SGML bias stuff. XML is SGML. Trying to make it seem otherwise is populist flame bait. It may stir the list up but if it can be stirred by that after this long engaging the issues, then that provides the precise example for why institutions typically manage specifications after they have been broadly accepted. Len Bullard Intergraph Public Safety clbullar@i... http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...]
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|