[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Mapping XHTML to XLink via Architectural Forms
David Megginson wrote: > > > Daniel Barclay writes: > > > > Architectural Forms would be ... > > > > Is there any clear, simple explanation of what Architectural Forms > > are out there? (Whatever I've encountered so far hasn't been clear > > enough to click.) > > If you have to ask, you're not ready to know yet. > > Seriously, over two years ago, I put an architectural-form proposal > together for XML and called it "XAF". The response was un-deafening, > and I think that the ISO people came up with a slightly different > syntax in the end, ... Two years ago I thought that XML was simple and SGML was complex. In the last 2 years XML (and its stable of technologies) has gotten alot more complex and in retrospect things like (X)AF are looking alot more simple, go figure. Jonathan Borden The Open Healthcare Group http://www.openhealth.org
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|