[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML Developers List <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 11:09:06 -0400

At 10:42 AM 10/23/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>Sure it does.  Sending the header "Accept: text/html" with the
>request means you want HTML and nothing else.  A conformant server
>that has no HTML version available must respond with a 406 error.

If it weren't for the fact that most browsers (and a number of other
applications copying the move) send out "Accept:*/*", this might even be
useful.

What is it?  "Be conservative in what you send, generous in what you
accept."  A great idea that don't always pay off as expected.


Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books

• Follow-Ups:
  • AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...>

• References:
  • RE: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: thanks to all, for your help
• Next by Date: W3Cs new policy of standardizing (Re: Schema at XML namespace URI tochange)
• Previous by thread: Re: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
• Next by thread: AW: Schema at XML namespace URI to change
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread