[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing versus in-lining
Rick Jelliffe wrote: > RELAX takes, I think, a sugar-free approach of making you declare types > before/separately > to binding them to element names. Actually, in RELAX, you can always swap two subordinates (except interface elements) of modules, and you are guaranteed to get the same result. That is, the physical order of subordinates of modules is not important. >But this results in very shallow trees > and therefore > more cross-referencing: ???? Makoto Internet: mura034@a... Nifty: VEQ00625
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|