[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Binary XML
> From: Mike Sharp [SMTP:msharp@l...] > Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 11:40 PM > To: xml-dev@x... > Subject: Re: Binary XML > >A WAP gateway does a binary tokenizing compression bit on the original WML, that >results in astonishing compression. <snip/> >I'd be curious what people think about it--without, as you say, involving the >wire protocol. Is it really necessary to map a specific token to a specific >element (for example)? I suppose that it would allow a user to de-tokenize the >document, returning it to some semblance of readability. But this could be done >in a particular implementation, if needed, by referencing some external document >map, couldn't it? While working with WAP a while back, it seemed to me that the binary compression used was only good at compressing the markup and not the content. So if you added 1k of text to an element, the file grew by 1k. For WAP pages, it worked fairly well, but in vocabularies with typically large amounts of content, it wouldn't be very efficient. Note that this may have been a feature of the implementation I was using - i.e. the Nokia WAP toolkit didn't bother compressing element content. I believe the WAP system has been submitted to the W3C as a general purpose compressed binary format for XML. Does anyone know whether it uses compression on the element text, or just on tag names etc.?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|