[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Schemas: ref'ing vs inlining
But Curt > Martin Bryan wrote: > > am I right in inferring that a valid XML content model of (a, b, c, b) cannot be expressed using a schema? > > No, the constraint that was quoted is on the top-level declarations in a > schema. It is saying you can't do: it also says that they apply to model group definitions, e.g to sequence and all. Hence my query about the wording of: > 2 Each of the {type definitions}, {element declarations}, {attribute > group definitions}, {model group definitions} and {notation > declarations} must not contain two or more schema components with the > same {name} and {target namespace}. Model group definitions are odd-balls. For any or all you want the rule to apply, but for sequence you definitely do not. Hence my great concern. Martin
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|