[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: groves vs. Groves was: Re: Why the Infoset?
At 05:57 PM 8/2/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >> What we need is a common language for the specification of XML subsets >> (grove plans), from the full fidelity XML property set. > >I think the idea of creating a formalism for specifying subsets of the Infoset >is a very plausible one, and if the Infoset ever gets out the door I will >think about the problem. I think I'm with Jonathan - his separating grove plans from the 'full fidelity XML property set' seems like the right direction. I'm not quite sure if John Cowan is planning here to subset the Infoset further, or to describe the Infoset as a subset from the ISO SGML property set... I like option 2 better there. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|