[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Remember to RELAX (was RE: Are there still a lot of people usingDTD)
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Simon St.Laurent wrote: > I hate to break up the party, but I'm hearing from more and more > people who are seriously considering converting to RELAX in addition > to or instead of W3C Schemas. There seem to be multiple trains on > the same track here, though one isn't from the W3C: > http://www.xml.gr.jp/relax/ > > Hopefully friendly competition will be a good thing. There are a > few stories on RELAX so far, one of the better ones being: > http://www.seyboldreports.com/News/2000/20000307.html I've assumed (from a distance) based on statements that use phrases like "upward compatibility" and "easy transition" that the functionality provided by RELAX was a subset of that provided by XML Schema. However, I haven't found anything in the latter comparable to the attribute- sensitive content models supported by RELAX. Is this because XML Schema doesn't have such a feature, or just because it's harder to find things in the more densely-worded Schema documentation (or perhaps just because I'm not reading carefully enough)? -- Bob Kline
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|