[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML -FinalReviewDraft)
On Wed, 2 Aug 2000, Aaron Skonnard wrote: > What we really need is the next version of XML ( Infoset + XML 1.0 - DTDs + > Namespaces + XBase/XInclude + XML Schemas ). And don't forget XLink as well. I think the real point with the Infoset is not that it's a grove plan of XML, but that it expresses a particular view of what are the "really important" bits of the whole XML + Namespaces + Xfoo standards collection, in a way which fits with the DOM and/or SAX that most people are using to process this stuff. Issuing a new version of XML with all the Xfoo standards added might not work, as it could quite easily prevent XML being a subset of SGML. -- Richard Lanyon (Software Engineer) | "The medium is the message" XML Script development, | - Marshall McLuhan DecisionSoft Ltd. |
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|