[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final ReviewDraft
At 07:31 PM 8/2/00 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote: >> At 04:27 PM 8/2/00 -0600, Aaron Skonnard wrote: >> >Once XSD and XInclude are done, DTDs are dead weight for the Infoset. >It's >> >really about the fundamental abstractions that we can infer from XML 1.0 >+ >> >Namespaces in light of our current direction. >> >> Whose current direction? > >The direction of the W3C and the world of component/system developers wrt >type information. Really? I'd love to see that formally stated by the W3C. I suspect we have an honest difference of opinion between one group of 'component/system developers' and another. XSD and XInclude aren't universally adored, and neither are 'fundamental abstractions', I'm afraid. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|