[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML-RPC or SOAP
> SOAP may be more 'advanced', but XML-RPC is very convenient and easy to > learn. For small projects, and maybe even for some relatively simple big > projects, XML-RPC makes a lot of sense. > > (I like to say that XML-RPC gives you enough rope to hang yourself, but > SOAP gives you enough rope to hang yourself and a lot of other people too. > Rope is, of course, useful for other things as well!) Without judging xml-rpc at all, the comments on SOAP are as often is the case for catchy statements not correct and I would encourage you not to paint this picture. The main generalizations that SOAP provide are that a) it is a one message that can be used for RPC as well as other things b) it is not bound to HTTP in any particular way As a wire protocol, SOAP doesn't anticipate any particular programming style or environment and is as such close to HTTP in spirit although it certainly takes into account what we have leaned from HTTP over the last x years. An example is the modularity that we get from having a well-defined core and features that use that core being separate. Henrik
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|