[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Arbitrary Infoset boundaries (was Re: Common XML - Final
>By not including DTDs as part of the infoset or DOM, the W3C groups are >making the simplification Speaking as a member of the DOM WG: Don't read too much into this. The fact that DTDs have not been included to date merely means that we haven't been willing to address them until we had a better understanding of how they do or don't interact with XML Schemas, since if at all possible we want to provide a single API to access both (many? all?) content model languages. DOM Level 3 is finally starting to address this issue, though there are still some open questions. I can't speak for Infoset. But again, I'd beware of confusing "we haven't done it yet" and "we don't think it should be done." ______________________________________ Joe Kesselman / IBM Research
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|