[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XML in .NET - more than just SOAP?
Joshua Allen wrote: >OK, I have looked more closely and Word's output is not entirely >"well-formed". [snip] >So, while it is not perfect (and it will get better) >it seems to me to be quite useful. I call it XML, >although a purist could nitpick some of the flaws. Sorry, if a parser throws a well-formedness error when I try to parse it, it's not XML in any way, shape, or form. Viewed another way, suppose I get bored one day and figure out the binary format of a Word document, then write a program that writes text files out using this format, but make a mistake somewhere and get just a few of the bits in the wrong order. Word will understandably refuse to parse this and, should I call MS support to complain, I will justifiably be laughed off the phone. While I have, in general, not worried too much about MS's attempts to "do something useful" in those cases where XML had grey areas (e.g. using XDR instead of XML Schemas, requiring namespace "declarations" in DTDs), this is just plain WRONG. Fix it, or don't call it XML. Unusually annoyed, -- Ron Bourret ________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|