[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Different schemas....
Take a look at this site: http://www.w3.org/XML/Activity#schema-wg I beleive XML Data was then updated (or reduced, whatever you like) to XDR wich is now used by the MS parser. XDR was there long before XML schema, so it is not a deviation but a first try to develop something like the W3C is doing now. AFAIK MS will be supporting XML schema fro W3C as soon as it becomes a recommendation (will it ever reach that state? :-)) and will support users to update their XDR files to XML schema from W3C. Of course this is the way I see it. Others may have other opinions or facts. I would be glad to hear them too... David -----Original message----- Van: Pamela Rais [mailto:pamela.rais@t...] Verzonden: dinsdag 11 juli 2000 15:50 Aan: 'xml-dev@l...' Onderwerp: Different schemas.... I see that Microsoft has Msxml 2.0 with Schema support which I think I understand correctly to be a slight deviation from the actual w3c proposal. What does this mean to developers who want to do early implementations? Of the few schemas I've seen... there are references to both w3c and Microsoft datatypes in their schema attributes or sometimes references to only MS data + datatypes and not w3c. Which is correct/common/good practise? Does the MS datatype schema do something that the w3c's can't? Are there other such deviations from the Schema proposal out there? If so, what are they? I'd appreciate any info that can enlighten me. I'm making the jump from SGML/DTD's and it seems quite daunting. Regards, Pamela Rais pamela.rais@t... -----end original message-----
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|