[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why the Infoset?
At 05:41 PM 7/31/00 -0400, Jonathan Borden wrote: >This is because of all the flak that SGML property sets and groves have >taken, so the Infoset is a renamed baby not yet tainted. If you want to be >able to define your own 'pruning' of a complete XML document you want >property sets and grove plans (and I'll bet *you* never thought you'd need >these :-) Thanks for the red herring, Jonathan. I'm not especially excited about groves, despite several efforts at becoming interested, but I don't find the Infoset adequate either. Its philosophy of partial abstraction (at least it's not meta-meta-abstraction) just seems plain broke. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|