[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: XLink transformations
> At 06:46 PM 7/19/00 -0700, Gavin Thomas Nicol wrote: > >Of course, linking in general is fragile if major source changes > are made. > > Maybe I'm a purist (nah -- I'm definitely a purist), but this is > an unacceptable situation to me. Links are put in documents for a reason, > and authors deserve some sort of protection from stylesheet > transformations that deform their content. In general, I'd be surprised if links *couldn't* be carried forward, simply because most of the tranformations I've seen over the years (for dynamic delivery) tend to be trivial, and tend to *add* markup. The situation probably isn't quite as bad as you might imagine.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|