[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] URI concerns continue
I (desperately) don't want to rehash the past 1700+ messages on xml-uri, but I'm concerned that the 'URIs in namespaces' issues seem to be spreading to XLink and to some extent to schemas. The 'solution' [1] put forward to answer the battle over relative URI references in namespaces should free lots of specifications from the current logjam, though it isn't clear [2] that the solution actually solves the problem so much as avoids it. Last week's XLink Candidate Recommendation [3] seems to bring the same questions that puzzled the xml-uri mailing list into a new venue, without providing any more specific answers. As Eric van der Vlist noted [4], questions regarding how to compare URI-based role and arcrole attributes are left unanswered, as is the pesky question of whether relative URIs are acceptable in these 'semantic attributes' and how they should be treated. (Plus there's always the lurking question of what if anything should be done with the entity bodies that may or may not be identified by these URIs.) It's also not clear that the 'solution' for namespaces URI references is appropriate to XLink URI references. Saturday, I put up a proposal on xml-uri [5] suggesting that the W3C stop using URI references unless questions of comparison and processing are explicitly answered, either on a spec-by-spec basis, or in a general Recommendation. So far, I haven't seen any public response. Today, on xmlschema-dev, we've had a brief run of questions regarding how to to identify local copies of a schema when the Internet is unavailable [6]. My suggestion that something akin to PUBLIC identifiers be used to make such problems more manageable generated a response from Dan Connolly [7] proposing that "But perhaps a little NOTE on how to support local copies of stuff in the Web, especially in XML software, would be useful" - a possible step forward, but a very small one. It seems like the W3C is pushing hard to use URIs to identify everything possible, without giving much concern to the difficult questions that have bedeviled the xml-uri list for the past two months. While the URI community seems happy to have identifiers that are processed using a wide variety of different rules, I'm not sure that approach is acceptable for XML processing. (It could become acceptable were URI processing and comparison, at least in an XML context, defined more clearly and explicitly.) While I welcome the effort to reuse existing parts, and could be persuaded that URIs are a good answer to all of these problems, I don't think that URIs are anywhere near mature or specified enough to carry the burdens that various XML specifications are placing on them. There is no reason to expect URI processing to be as predictable as XML processing (even with the many possibilities in XML processing), and I'm very worried that URIs are a threat to XML processing in the absence of constraints that would make URI processing and usage predictable. [1] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jul/0005.html [2] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jul/0009.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jul/0011.html [3] - http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/#link-semantics [4] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-linking-comments/2000JulSep/0013 .html [5] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000Jul/0016.html [6] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2000Jul/ [7] - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2000Jul/0006.html Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|