[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Future of Formatting Objects (XSL/FO)

  • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>
  • To: xml-dev@x...
  • Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 14:26:54 +0100

xsl fo framemaker
I was rather surprised by the amount of negativity in this discussion; my
original posting was meant to give support to those people who are actually
working on FOP, rather than get them depressed!

It seemed axiomatic to me that FOs were a good thing. Taking CML as an
example, I need to have a way of rendering the information [I shall avoid
the word "print"]. At present that rendering is usually in pixels - a
highly dangerous process - as pixels can get eliminated by rescaling and
the *wrong* information gets communicated. XML is the obvious answer. 

I agree wholeheartedly that rendering should be to all sorts of media [and
have consistently argued for this on XML-DEV since it started]. At present
our methods of *sending renderable information over the WWW* are horrible.
We have the following:
	- proprietary. I am not convinced that Word+Framemaker sent to a UNIX box
is an ideal solution.
	- status quo - XML, with no default method of rendering it.

If we compare the situation with SVG two years ago we had similar
discussions. SVG has no chance because:
	- no one wants it
	- CGM/Framemaker/VRML/whatever does everything that anyone wants
	- the manufacturers will never agree

SVG isn't finished but already we have several high-quality
implementations, which some of us are already starting to use
enthusiastically. The prototypes had missing bits and bugs but I haven't
heard a negative word on this list about SVG recently.

So why can't FOP have the same dynamics? If a group of committed people
want to drive it forward, what is lost? No one has suggested that it is
taking us away from a currently ongoing better way of doing it, or that if
it succeeds it will undermine the rest of XML. I see XML-DEV as a way of
encouraging collaborative efforts whether or not they finally succeed "in
the market place". Personally I will use the results of FOP and do what
little I can to support it. 

But then I spend most of my time near windmills.

	P.


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.