[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XSLFo
It seems more likely to me that a rendering engine (on the server-side initially) would take FO's as input and produce VoiceXML as output. So it sounds like you might not get all the functionality from the FO approach as you would from generating VoiceXML directly, but that seems like a trade-off that you could decide on on a case-by-case basis. Tim McCune Software Architect, ChannelPoint "There are no stupid questions, only stupid people." -- Mr. Garrison -----Original Message----- From: martind@n... [mailto:martind@n...] ...the other question is (and this is probably the most important one) Will you find any XSLFO "aural" implementations or will you find any VoiceXML implementations? To my knowledge there is more then 3 voiceXML browsers currently in development or in test. How many "aural" XSLFo interpreters are currently under devlopement or under tests? To my knowledge there is none? Does Anybody knows one under development or under tests? if yes, please let us know. So, Let's be more precise and correct the original sentence. Even if XSLFo theoritically specifies a rudimentary "aural" model, what is the probability that you'll find any "aural" XSLFo browser? And the second question is: Is there any "aural" implementation available? Is this better now? Is the sentence enough precise? *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|