[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: [very personal analysis] .com, .net and .org

• From: "Ashvil" <ashvil@i...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:42:55 -0700

> Why do people keep comparing C# to Java?  It only replaces
> Java in one
> very limited context, and that is as a COM binder.  Since

It looks like it was designed for COM+ integration and XML,SOAP
integration thru COM.


>   C# is not a server plugin technology.  Modern servers
> require threading
> that C# does not provide.
>

COM+ provides the platform for threading. If you follow the Microsoft
Bible, you would create a COM+ component, where it would take these
details for you. What's missing in the released documentation is the
Common Language Runtime stuff that Microsoft keeps hinting.

I am not sure what advantages it has over Visual Basic 7 except the C
style syntax which may be more clean. It makes more sense to compare
it with VB7 but I do agree with Eric, from a political sense it puts
more pressure on Sun to loosen control on Java.

Regards,
Ashvil


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • Re: [very personal analysis] .com, .net and .org
    • From: Andrew n marshall <amarshal@z...>

• Prev by Date: input/output matrix ofXML tools, e.g. based on: data, schema, code
• Next by Date: Re: control characters
• Previous by thread: Re: [very personal analysis] .com, .net and .org
• Next by thread: Re: [very personal analysis] .com, .net and .org
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread