[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

xml-dev (and the archives)

• From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 17:15:17 +0100

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xml-dev@x... [mailto:owner-xml-dev@x...]On Behalf Of
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Sent: 01 June 2000 09:01
> To: 'xml-dev@x...'
> Subject: RE: Software patent debate: we lose round one

[...comments on archives removed...]

> It is our intention to address the current archives...

Speaking of which the archives seem to have hit a glitch
over the last few days as the threaded view [1] seems to
have erm, come unravelled.

> I do think that this is a very important area where XML-DEV can play an
> important role.

I agree, there's a lot of useful information in XML-DEV, as well
as a lot of ideas. It'd be great to capture that somewhere.

Note that you can search over the postings I've abstracted for
'eclectic' using the Meerkat wire service [2]. I don't think
its a complete archive of what I've pulled out, but there's
still a lot of material there (and more being added).

For example this search [3] pulls out all references to SAX.

(The display format for quotes is a bit broken, not sure if
its me, or the RSS syndication. Its on the TODO list anyway)

[1]. http://www.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/2000/05/thread.html
[2]. http://www.oreillynet.com/meerkat/
[3].
http://www.oreillynet.com/meerkat/index.php?profile=0&chan[]=555&rss_search=
SAX&period_type=ALL

Cheers,

L.

--
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect       | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic |    sine necessitates"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant    |     -- William of Ockham


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Software patent debate: we lose round one
    • From: Peter Murray-Rust <peter@u...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Looking for suggestions
• Next by Date: Intel Netstructure xml director
• Previous by thread: RE: Software patent debate: we lose round one
• Next by thread: Re: Software patent debate: we lose round one
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread