[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Another Question

• From: tpassin@h...
• To: "xml-dev" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 21:33:01 -0400

John Cowan says-

> tpassin@h... wrote:
>
> > One of the interesting issues is
> > that ASN.1 has both named data types and named identifiers (an element
has
> > both a type and an identifier), but in XML you have only element names
> > (basically representing complex data types).  So do you use identifiers
or
> > data type names, and what do you do with the other of the pair?  There
are a
> > lot of possible solutions.
>
> There are, but the natural SGML/XML one is to map the ASN.1 type onto the
> element type/generic identifier, and the ASN.1 identifier onto an
attribute
> of type ID.
>
Yes, or possibly the other way around.  Clearly turning the type into an
element name is what makes sense.  But the people we're working with/for
about this were very strongly against using attributes unless forced to in a
few cases.  So far it has been hard to get this restriction relaxed
completely. But we're pecking away at it.

Tom Passin


***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • RE: Another Question
    • From: johns@s... (John F. Schlesinger)
  • Re: Another Question
    • From: Olivier DUBUISSON <Olivier.Dubuisson@f...>
  • Re: Another Question
    • From: tpassin@h...
  • Re: Another Question
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: control characters
• Next by Date: Re: XSL question
• Previous by thread: Re: Another Question
• Next by thread: Re: Another Question
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread