[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: The problem with typography (with or without flow objects)
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > Yes, definitely. But how big a job is that, compared to translating the > style rules from (say) LaTeX to Framemaker. If I have to switch to a > new FO formatter, I have a not inconsiderable task on my hands, > if I want to rerun old jobs. But the effort I put into instantiating > design rules as FOs remains, and I claim that I am ahead of the game. No question, as a common typesetting syntax and even as something that handles part of the migration, FOs are useful, but I think that's where it ends. If we're going to continue with this, you're going to have to start getting up earlier - you keep sending responses through at 7:00 pm when I'm trying to get out of here...:-) -- Regards, Marcus Carr email: mrc@a... ___________________________________________________________________ Allette Systems (Australia) www: http://www.allette.com.au ___________________________________________________________________ "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." - Einstein *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|