[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@x...
• Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:53:59 -0500

Oliver Becker wrote:
> 
> ...
>
> There is a W3C note, dated 05-05-2000 - but that can hardly be
> characterized as acceptance.

I observe that the W3C NOTE process is confusing to anyone that does not
follow the W3C closely. The fact that they are displayed along with the
other specifications gives them a warm standards glow that they would
not have if they were separated out. People often talk to me about NOTEs
as if they were RECs.

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
"Hardly anything more unwelcome can befall a scientific writer than 
having the foundations of his edifice shaken after the work is 
finished.  I have been placed in this position by a letter from 
Mr. Bertrand Russell..." 
 - Frege, Appendix of Basic Laws of Arithmetic (of Russell's Paradox)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • VoiceXML news
    • From: Oliver Becker <obecker@i...>

• Prev by Date: VoiceXML news
• Next by Date: Re: W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
• Previous by thread: VoiceXML news
• Next by thread: Re: W3C Notes (was Re: VoiceXML news)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread