[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: onomastical

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: Burnard Towers <lou.burnard@c...>, "xml-dev@x..." <xml-dev@X...>
• Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 10:04:29 -0400

Burnard Towers wrote:

> >This may be adequate for mere document markup,
> >but for processing (document or otherwise), we need to be able to
> >handle every case somehow
> 
> Sorry, this doesnt make any sense to me. What's "mere" about document
> markup? and why should it preclude being able to handle every case?

If you just want to mark up an existing document set, then you can have
a system that handles only a subset of possible cases.  If you need to
represent the name of just anybody, then you need to have a general
system that will not cough on any naming scheme.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• References:
  • onomastical
    • From: Lou Burnard <lou.burnard@c...>
  • Re: onomastical
    • From: Burnard Towers <lou.burnard@c...>

• Prev by Date: Test suite suggestion
• Next by Date: Previous XML-DEV namespace discussions
• Previous by thread: Re: onomastical
• Next by thread: Re: XML DTD Creation
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread