[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] The Dow Of Groves
I think the poster was right. Groves are neat but essentially are just one more of a set of formal means for rigorously defining an encoding. Not that that is a trivial capability, but certainly not a mysterious one. I am surprised, given what I read in the schema primer and the SOAP spec that groves hasn't been adopted. It seems that SOAP depends heavily on schema for its own definitions. The question is, are those definitions are strong as the ones produced using groves? len *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|