[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Pontifications on the Perversity of Pedantry, Punditry, and Purple
> Is there any chance that future versions of the XML > Recommendation and/or the InfoSet will deprecate the weird terminology in favor of the conventional language of mathematics/software engineering? > ... e.g., call a tag a "tag" and an "XML element information item" a "node" like God > intended? ;~) Whatever they do, I sincerely hope that <a> and <a> will be two different tags with the same type/name. And I also hope that any future standards will have fewer ambiguities and vaguenesses than the current specs, rather than more. Everyday language, which is very good at using the same word to mean different things and different words to mean the same thing depending on the context, has no place in standards. Mike Kay *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|