[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Official ISO 639 changes
Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > Has anybody noticed that XML 1.0 requires 2-letter and forbids > three-letter language codes? From section 2.1.2 of the XML 1.0 spec: > ... > I think XML needs another erratum here to fix this. There is one in the works, but no agreement yet. Some think than XML parsers should not validate the content of xml:lang and just pass it to the application. The spec would be understood to just say that the semantics are from RFC 1766 (or its eventual successor with 3-letter codes). Others think that it is important for parsers to validate xml:lang. Adding 3-letter codes then means a substantive change to the spec which may have to wait for XML 1.1 (or whatever the next version is). Opinions welcome. -- François Yergeau *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|