[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: what Napster means for XML
At 01:14 PM 4/25/00 -0400, David Megginson wrote: >Clearly, both approaches can work, but I don't think it's very >responsible to push either as The Solution To Every Problem. >Basically, a peer-to-peer system can make high-demand items available >more easily by spreading the cost of distribution among more users, >while a client-server system can make all items available predictably >and in an easily-referenced location. Look at the kind of information >you're publishing, and make the choice. Agreed - but right now it seems like most vendors and many others are focusing on the client-server model as TSTEP (The Solution...) while peer-to-peer isn't getting much attention. Perhaps it's just that the client-server model is a better fit for the approach relational vendors have encouraged over the years, but I'd like to think XML opens up a wider range of possibilities than centralized data warehousing and widely distributed but barely shared binary files have provided so far. Peer-to-peer needs a lot of infrastructure work and no small amount of selling to catch on, but it seems like critical work to me. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.com *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|