[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Common XML (was Re: Document Feature Requirements)
>That means that you're going to get XML => proprietary internal >storage => XML, where the XML that comes out may or may not bear any >resemblance to the XML that goes in -- elements, attributes, PIs, and >even character data may come out completely transformed (or not at >all), because equivalence will be defined by something other than the >XML markup model. Going even further, a significant proportion of XML applications will not involve XML documents at all! As long as applications use XML APIs such as SAX or DOM, wire format can be anything. I have seen too many people get overhyped into using XML as the wire format when their existing wire format works just fine. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@d... Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.com *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|