[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Discussions on XML-DEV [was RE: need for defining standard APIs for

• From: ashvil@I... (Ashvil)
• To: "'XML-Dev Mailing list'" <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:43:50 -0800

> It is great to have replies like ++im's. They can be re-used over a long
> period of time. The idea of XML-JEWELS (no longer active) and Leigh Dodds'
> excellent efforts makes sure that we have a better chance of re-finding
> these articles when we want them. [I am still searching for a way in which
> we can regard some of these as "publications".] I shall certainly refer
> back to these when I am concerned about "XML repositories".
>

One small suggestion. After a discussion on the list on a topic, it would be
helpful if either the topic originator or someone else could summarize the
thread, with a mail with the subject 'Summary - <<Topic>>'.

This way we can document what was agreed upon or what's points need further
work and we can distribute the responsibility of creating something as
valuable as XML-Jewels.

Regards,
Ashvil





***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Discussions on XML-DEV [was RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage]
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: xml spec 1.0 validity constraint for ID/IDREF
• Next by Date: RE: xml spec 1.0 validity constraint for ID/IDREF
• Previous by thread: media types of stylesheets
• Next by thread: RE: Discussions on XML-DEV [was RE: need for defining standard APIs for xml storage]
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread