[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: ANN: SAX 2.0 extension proposals.
David Brownell writes: > If you care about which parser you get, then ask for it. Else > you asked for a default, and you got one. Anyone who can control > a system property can do the same to a class path, but the converse > isn't true. Software setting up a controlled environment for running > components (a preferred model) will assemble it at runtime using > class loader primitives and such, but can't set system properties > differently. So what you want, I think, is simply a statement to the effect that it's OK to build your own XMLReaderFactory with the same class name and shadow the existing one? I don't see any harm, but is that the kind of thing that needs to be mentioned explicitly? All the best, David -- David Megginson david@m... http://www.megginson.com/ *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|