[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Anti-Ranti

• From: "Michael Champion" <mike.champion@s...>
• To: <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 20:52:25 -0500

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Brownell" <david-b@p...>
To: "Rick JELLIFFE" <ricko@a...>; <xml-dev@x...>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: Anti-Ranti


>
> Curiously, the official W3C process expects all non-members to wait
> till "Proposed Recommendation" or (new) "Candidate Recommendation"
> to express opinions.  An "appropriate" moment is already defined.

I don't think this is a fair reading of the W3C process document
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Process/Process-19991111/tr.html#RecsWD
 It says "This is a public W3C Working Draft for review by W3C members and
other interested parties"

Thus, the appropriate moment can be the Working Draft.  Granted, it takes a
lot of faith, hope, naivete, or resources to implement WDs since they are
highly subject to change, but non-members who want to participate in the
process are VERY welcome to try implementing WDs and comment on their
problems.  As a matter of fact, that is exactly how one usually becomes an
"invited expert".

Mind you, I agree that many working groups are not sufficiently responsive
to outside input, but this is the style of the WGs, not the policy of the
W3C.



***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Anti-Ranti
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• References:
  • W3C Rant
    • From: "Matthew Gertner" <matthew@p...>
  • Anti-Ranti
    • From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Anti-Ranti
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>

• Prev by Date: plea for consistency
• Next by Date: Yet another SAX2 observation
• Previous by thread: Re: Anti-Ranti
• Next by thread: Re: Anti-Ranti
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread