[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Schema concepts

• From: Stefan Haustein <stefan.haustein@t...>
• To: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@i...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:03:38 +0100

THOMAS PASSIN wrote:
> 
(...)
>
> Using OOP to build an application does not automatically require that every
> piece of the schema be an OOP object.  That might or might not be a useful
> approach.  An XML document may be used in a large number of ways, requiring
> different methods.  So I don't think that the WD is headed in the wrong
> direction here.

While I agree to your statement, I do not understand the conclusion:
Wouldn't a simplified XML Schena spec help all processors, regardless
if they are OOP or not? 

Or do you see a concrete advantage of the type/element distinction
in your application field?

Best regards

Stefan

--
SAX-based access to WBXML and WML: http://www.trantor.de/wbxml
XML pull parser: http://www.trantor.de/xml

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Schema concepts
    • From: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@i...>

• References:
  • RE: Schema concepts
    • From: "Jeff Lowery" <jlowery@s...>
  • Re: Schema concepts
    • From: THOMAS PASSIN <tpassin@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Schema concepts
• Next by Date: Re: Schema concepts
• Previous by thread: RE: Schema concepts
• Next by thread: Re: Schema concepts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread