[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves)

• From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@k...>
• To: Daniel.Veillard@w..., "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@x...>
• Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:02:31 +0100

Daniel Vellard wrote:

>   If the WG didn't provide a response it's an error and as staff contact I'm
> partly reponsible for this. Is there any specific comment you made that
> you would like being answered now, please point me to it I will dig in
> the WG archives to provide the answer.

If that holds not only for Simon, I would like to ask why XML schema
needs both <element> and <type>. It looks like they both correspond
to the class concept in OOP. See

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000JanMar/0101.html

Best regards

Stefan
-- 
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de

• Follow-Ups:
  • Schema concepts (was Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves))
    • From: ht@c... (Henry S. Thompson)

• References:
  • The Power of Groves
    • From: Steve Schafer <pandeng@t...>
  • Re: The Power of Groves
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@i...>
  • Re: The Power of Groves
    • From: Len Bullard <cbullard@h...>
  • Re: The Power of Groves
    • From: "W. Eliot Kimber" <eliot@i...>
  • Re: The Power of Groves
    • From: "Michael Champion" <Mike.Champion@s...>
  • W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves)
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves)
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: The Power of Groves
• Next by Date: Re: Why ANY is so restrictive?
• Previous by thread: Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves)
• Next by thread: Schema concepts (was Re: W3C public lists (was Re: The Power of Groves))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread