[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Who would "bless" a Schema subset? (was Re: XML Schemas: Needs Marke
At 12:58 PM 2/12/00 -0700, Arnold, Curt wrote: >It has been hinted to me that the next XML Schema draft would be more >"layered". So the "blessing" could be from the W3C. If such a thing were to happen, I think a lot of us would cheer! >It is obvious that there are definitely a lot of features that >make authoring easy (such as imports, includes, type inheritance, >equivClasses) that should be "compiled" or "preprocessed" out before so >that every validation attempt doesn't have to repeat the effort of >fetching every imported schema, etc. I'd really like to see this 'result' schema vocabulary specified formally somewhere, even if it isn't at the W3C - it would make writing processors much simpler, especially if the project you suggest below comes to pass. >I've suggested an open-source effort to create XSLT transforms >that perform this translation from the authoring schema to the >validation subset and have gotten a few volunteers. I've been >waiting for the next draft of schema and some place to host the >effort to become apparent. This would be great to see. Standardized components and a standard set of simplifying transformations would make life much easier. Now if we could take the Schematron approach of using XSLT to check documents against the schema - well, that would be interesting. (And as is well known, I'm not even a large XSL fan.) Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.com
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|