[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: A certain difficulty
At 10:46 AM 2/25/00 -0500, David Megginson wrote: >You must keep more than that -- at the very minimum, you probably keep >a fourth property indicating whether the RDF object is literal text, >non-RDF XML markup, or a reference to another resource. Otherwise, >there would be no way to distinguish the string "http://www.foo.com/" >from the resource "http://www.foo.com". This is true; a level of typing that is only marginally acknowledged to exist in the RDF spec, which seems to pretendthat the difference between a property's value being a string and a resource is a *syntactic* issue. Still, you couldn't discard this information and be left with anything useful. -Tim *************************************************************************** This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers. To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@x...&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html ***************************************************************************
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|