[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++

• From: Steinar Bang <sb@m...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: 04 Jan 2000 08:40:05 +0100

>>>>> roddey@u...:

>>> For those folks who need to store text, they can certainly strip off
>>> unwanted bytes before storing it. It is much more reasonable to
>>> require transcoding of people storing text than to require everyone
>>> using the data on the fly to transcode.

>> Using data on the fly is what I want to do.  That's why I prefer to
>> get it in the form I will use it.

> For most people though, UTF-8 is a loser.

Please note that in the quoted text, I was talking about converting
from UTF-16 stored in 32 bit wchar_t, to UTF-16 stored in 16 bit wide
character strings.

I was worried about the overhead of using 32 bit for 16 bit values,
and I was worried about the conversion overhead from 32 bit to 16 bit
strings. 

Nothing about UTF-8 at all.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
    • From: roddey@u...

• Prev by Date: No Subject
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Previous by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Next by thread: Re: Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread