[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Costs of the W3C

• From: "Reynolds, Gregg" <greynolds@d...>
• To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@t...>, xml-dev <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 13:49:28 -0600

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Bray [mailto:tbray@t...]
> Sent: Monday, January 17, 2000 1:16 PM
> 
> And in my experience, it *takes* that 20% just to stay on top of the
> issues so that when you say something, it's well-informed and useful. 
> 
> It's a problem. -T.
> 

Wow, you can do that with just 8 hours a week?  :)  In my experience, that's
just enough to take a sip from the firehose without getting my lips ripped
off.  Rarely enought time to also think up solutions - comments are
tantamount to pleas for the people doing the designing to pay attention to
your concerns.  In an open process there would at least be the possibility
that sheer numbers would help ensure everybody's concerns are addressed.  Or
at least find out if others share those concerns.

-gregg

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Prev by Date: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: Re: Costs of the W3C
• Next by thread: XML and java
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread