[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Alternatives to the W3C

• From: "Steven Livingstone" <s.livingstone@b...>
• To: "Ann Navarro" <ann@w...>
• Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 00:52:10 -0000

> There's nothing in IE 5 functionality that is so compelling to *content*
> that it should be "required" to use.

Maybe not content on it's own, but it is *much* easier to develop for and
using XSL, providing different interfaces to different users it so easy.

>Many, many users and customers will
> happily surf away to something else if you try and force wholly
unnecessary
> artificial barriers at them.

I find the opposite true. There are so many developments out there now that
require far too many mouse clicks to get to the information you want. The
interfaces are just so bulky and it put's me off. Content if different from
applications which are much more difficult to develop for.

I experienced the problem today. IE 5 users had no probs and were quite
happy with the system. Other users were not happy with clicking all the
time. I am talking about Application dev right enough - content is likely
different !?

cheers
steven

Steven Livingstone
Glasgow, Scotland.
+44 (0) 7771 957 280

Professional XML
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861003110
Professional Site Server 3
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002696
Professional Site Server 3.0 Commerce Edition
http://www.wrox.com/Consumer/Store/Details.asp?ISBN=1861002505
----- Original Message -----
From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
To: Dave Winer <dave@u...>
Cc: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@i...>
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2000 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: Alternatives to the W3C


> At 03:38 PM 1/19/00 -0800, Dave Winer wrote:
>
> >The market is moving to IE 5 at a quick pace now. And there are plenty of
> >popular web sites that only work with IE5.The more of these there are,
the
> >easier it will be to settle on IE 5 as the default browser.
>
> Sure, if you want to limit your audience that way.
>
> There's nothing in IE 5 functionality that is so compelling to *content*
> that it should be "required" to use. Many, many users and customers will
> happily surf away to something else if you try and force wholly
unnecessary
> artificial barriers at them.
>
> >I didn't invent this way of doing things, I'm just telling you where
we're
> >at right now.
>
> Your conclusions are highly debatable.
>
> Ann
> ---
> Just Released! - HTML BY Example
> Now shipping -  Mastering XML
> Also in print:  Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
>
> Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
> Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
> Director, HWG Online Education
http://www.hwg.org/services/classes
>
>
>
>
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
> Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
> Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer
to OASIS.
>
>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: Ann Navarro <ann@w...>
  • Re: Alternatives to the W3C
    • From: "Dave Winer" <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: XML and database examples
• Next by Date: IMPORTANT: UNSUBSCRIBING
• Previous by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Next by thread: Re: Alternatives to the W3C
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread