[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)

• From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 15:57:15 -0800

At 12:13 PM 1/14/00 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>The reason not to mandate it is that there are non-parser
>applictions of SAX, where it's unreasonable to demand that
>the event source guarantee such interning.

Really?  Could you expand on that? 

Mind you, this debate on what is really a fairly minor piece of SAX
is probably coming approaching a negative cost-benefit ratio.
-T.	

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
    • From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
  • Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: IMPORTANT: MODERATION [Was Re: [Xml] Inventory]
• Next by Date: RE: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Previous by thread: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Next by thread: Re: String interning (WAS: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread