[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Auxiliary parses/subdocuments in XML
In article <Pine.LNX.4.10.10001241650060.24193-100000@g...>, Norman Gray <norman@a...> wrote: >However: the definition of `unparsed entity' at the beginning of >section 4 of the XML spec states that an unparsed entity's contents >may not be XML. Fortunately you have chosen the unintended meaning of the ambiguous wording. When it says "may not be XML" it means "may be not XML". This is clarified in the errata: E25 Clarification Source: minutes XML-Syntax 1999-02-24 E30 Section 4 Amend the first sentence of the third paragraph to read: "An unparsed entity is a resource whose contents may or may not be text, and if text, may be other than XML." Rationale: The original text could be interpreted as saying that unparsed entities which are text can't be XML, which is wrong. -- Richard -- Spam filter: to mail me from a .com/.net site, put my surname in the headers. "The Internet is really just a series of bottlenecks joined by high speed networks." - Sam Wilson xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Unsubscribe by posting to majordom@i... the message unsubscribe xml-dev (or) unsubscribe xml-dev your-subscribed-email@your-subscribed-address Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|