[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Great controversies of XML

• From: David Brownell <david-b@p...>
• To: Steven Champeon <schampeo@h...>
• Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:58:03 -0800

Steven Champeon wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Tim Bray wrote:
> > >6. Internal Subsets
> >
> > Shouldn't that just be 6. DTDs?
> 
> Or, "SGML DTDs vs. Schemae"?

Make that "XML" DTDs, since SGML ones (like the HTML 4.0 DTD)
can't work in XML!

I'd actually generalize this:

6. How do I formalize my data models?

DTDs being one choice.  There are several schema based solutions,
as well as a variety of algorithmic ones.

Most tool vendors will gladly explain to you why their tool is
better than all the others, and politely dodge the issue of
which one is better for your particular task ... I'm a huge
believer that there will not be (and should not be) a single
"one size fits all" approach.

If nothing else, I'll point to the way human civilization
evolved over the past millenia to accomodate diversity.
That is, when it's not focussed on wars to eliminate it!
Data modeling has always been a microcosm of that.

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Great controversies of XML
    • From: Steven Champeon <schampeo@h...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Any public source code for an XML Schema (12/17/99) checker out t here?
• Next by Date: Sting interning: test cases wanted.
• Previous by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Next by thread: Re: Great controversies of XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread