[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article

• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• To: XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@i...>
• Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2000 09:43:12 -0500

At 07:00 AM 1/17/00 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>I think one of the key points in the W3C process is to avoid arbitrary
>design decision, changes to specs are reached by WG consensus, and
>then once the spec is finished it has to get approval from the director
>and members.
>  Arbitrary design decision can lead to a speedy specification, they
>also can generate serious problems, we try to avoid that.

Arbitrary design decisions within the W3C seem to be the cause of unending
discussions on XML-dev, if _any_ of the stories I've heard at conferences
are true.

(I don't think the W3C process was set up arbitrarily, though it too
appears to be the cause of unending discussions.)

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.

• References:
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Robert La Quey <robertl1@h...>
  • Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w...>

• Prev by Date: xml and asp HELP!
• Next by Date: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Previous by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Next by thread: Re: Microsoft's responce to XML.com article
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread