[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: [RE: SAX2/Java: Towards a final form]
Miles Sabin <msabin@c...> wrote: >I don't think dropping 'extends Parser' should impact on this >in any really significant way. Intially I would expect almost >all parsers to implement both XMLReader _and_ Parser for SAX1 >compatibility, so you'd have a fair breathing space during >which casting from the former to the latter would be safe. >Actually, one of my worries is that having XMLReader extend >a deprecated interface will cause javac/jikes/javadoc to spit >out warnings or errors ... not a big deal, perhaps, but a bit >of a pain (I'm one of those people who habitually set the >'treat warnings as errors' flag on all my tools ;-). In addition to a wide miss on the downcast thing (as David pointed out), I also forgot about deprecation warnings across the board. Better for the clean break, new methods on my end, and I confine any deprecation (forced by my logic) to the old stuff. Now I'll confine the few synapses I apparently have running to getting my list replies in context... ;) Regards, Jim Layer ____________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com. xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ or CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 Please note: New list subscriptions now closed in preparation for transfer to OASIS.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|