[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Well-formed and valid
> james anderson <James.Anderson@m...> writes: > > > > ... it is possible to have a document that is well-formed but > > > not valid XML 1.0, but still conforms to Namespaces, RDF, or XLink > > > (though not XHTML, which requires validity for strict conformance). Well XHTML is no different from any other _document type_. A document type such as docbook or XHTML must conform to a DTD or it would not be a document type! There is nothing to stop you from using XHTML elements with a namespace in a hybrid document. Frank xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i... Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1 To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; unsubscribe xml-dev To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message; subscribe xml-dev-digest List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|