[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Content or Metadata?

• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• To: xml-dev@i...
• Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 07:15:05 -0600

Mike Spreitzer wrote:
> 
> What about the list of authors of a scholarly paper?  Isn't that metadata for which order
> matters?

Think of it from a programming language perspective:

class doc:
	title: string
	published: date
	authors: list of string
	text: list of (para|list|img)

The authors property is unordered with respect to the other properties
but its domain is ordered. The *list of authors* is metadata for the doc
object.

In grove land we allow a single, particular property to be labeled as
the content property. In this case it would be the "text:" property. In
a language like Python, you would navigate "regular (metadata)"
properties like this:

doc.publisher.address.street

and content properties like this:

doc[5][3][2][4]

In the former, the name is significant. In the latter the position is
significant. All of this is explained at:

http://www.prescod.net/groves/shorttut

-- 
 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for himself
"I always wanted to be somebody, but I should have been more
specific." --Lily Tomlin

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • RE: Content or Metadata?
    • From: "Mike Spreitzer" <spreitze@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX/C++: First interface draft
• Next by Date: Re: SAX/C++: C++-specific design principles
• Previous by thread: RE: Content or Metadata?
• Next by thread: Re: Content or Metadata?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread