[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2

• From: "Don Park" <donpark@d...>
• To: "'XMLDev list'" <xml-dev-digest@i...>
• Date: Fri, 3 Dec 1999 13:12:18 -0800

David,

I believe language specific SAX bindings can and should be
delegated to others with you and rest of us keeping an eye
on its progress.  [btw, I am busy :]  Just form a small
group (2-3 people) out of the people who are applying
pressure on you about SAX/C++, throw in a C++ guru for
flavor, and stir.  XML-DEV can serve as the sounding board
for this and other languages (Smalltalk?).

SAX2 work, on the other hand, is far more important IMHO.
Lets get the namespace support added and revisit the
parser features and missing callback issues.

Best,

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark@d...
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@i...
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@i... the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@i...)

• References:
  • SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
    • From: David Megginson <david@m...>

• Prev by Date: DOM ECMAScript Test Suite
• Next by Date: RE: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Previous by thread: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Next by thread: Re: SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread